The result was Procedural speedy keep. No reason was given for deletion. If there is a reason that this article should be deleted, it can be renominated with a reason given. Metropolitan90 (talk) 21:50, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
—AssassiN's Creed (talk) 04:42, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Can you tell me what's wrong with it ? (as you can see, I've not been long on Wikipedia ;-) ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pacman 2.0 (talk • contribs) 07:27, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
e.g. I just found out how to re-cite a source a second time, gonna apply that right now....
Can you tell me, how I cite, if I plugged in the easiest example for a general result? Just cite the general result? Pacman 2.0 (talk)
Well, now I've finished the complete article including 11 sources from several authors. One place with citation still needed, and several places where more information is wished for have been apropriately marked. In the talk page I have opened several threads asking for certain further improvement....
I really would appreachiate, if you could now terminate the pending deletion as I can't really see a reason. As far as I understood Wiki-Policy, it's not so polite, to discourage a newbie doing it's first page by immediately threating with deletion (it's been ca. 10h), while some sections were marked "while-writing" ;-) Pacman 2.0 (talk)