The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was SPEEDY DELETE. Harro5 03:23, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eponymous subject is non-notable, probably also fits vanity classification. MarcoTolo 02:13, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete - CSD A7, fails WP:BIO and meets speedy criteria, tagged as such. --lightdarkness ^(talk) 02:14, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete Pretty much a textbook example of a typical vanity article. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 02:25, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete.--blue520 03:11, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.