The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Ifnord 23:26, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from speedy. Not sure that State highways are speediable. No vote. Vegaswikian 19:47, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong keep You must be joking, I myself participate in the Wiki project for Washington State highways --Ruby 19:57, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong keep. By precedent, major numbered highways merit articles on Wikipedia. I've even created a couple myself. --Kinu ^t/_c 20:33, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep State routes are notable per precedent. Adrian~enwiki (talk) 20:40, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep. Precedent for now is that all roads that US states have bothered to number are notable for inclusion. youngamerican (talk) 20:54, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I have added some information and cleaned up the article a wee bit. BobbyLee 21:16, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all state routes. -- Grev 18:23, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Keep per all above. Ardric47 03:44, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. There are only about 2580 other U.S. highway articles. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 04:50, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep or else If you delete this, you delete about 1000 other articles.
• Keep as above.Rt66lt 02:10, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.