The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE j⚛e decker ^talk 16:27, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New Liberalism (book)

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Book that doesn't meet WP:NBOOK after some verification. There are several references, but many are 404 (including the book's official website.) One verified article from a local BC paper (the author lives in Abbotsford, a city in BC.) Reception section is completely unreferenced. Uses YouTube, blog posts, and direct links to image files as references. Can't find independent reviews in reliable sources, so despite the visible references, this misses the WP:NBOOK bar. Mikeblas (talk) 12:39, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 00:48, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.