The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. sufficient consensus DGG ( talk ) 06:20, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Netbee Hosting

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hosting provider with no indication of notability per WP:CORP. Won two business awards of unknown notability. No significant coverage online from WP:RS. OnionRing (talk) 11:10, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. OnionRing (talk) 11:11, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. OnionRing (talk) 11:11, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:43, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as by far nothing at all convincing with my searches finding nothing better at all, there's by far nothing at all convincing. SwisterTwister talk 06:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The content of the article is promotional. Although some of the company's work has been nominated for a couple of awards, I cannot see that either of these are notable. For example, the CSSDA appears to be a mechanism to showcase designers. Of the six references: two are press releases, two are awards/showcase site pages, a blog on website themes that has a focus on construction, and link to the company's own website. There is a lack of sources that are reliable and independent. The claim made of Netbee being "one of the world's leading website hosting companies" has not been verified, notability has not been established. Drchriswilliams (talk) 07:20, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.