The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to YTCracker. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:59, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nerdrap Entertainment System (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

this album does not appear to be notable because there are no reliable sources to attest to its notability Theserialcomma (talk) 00:41, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Sounds like fun. Looks to be non-notable. Seems promotional in nature at any rate. Delete. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 01:27, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, article fails to establish notability per WP:MUSIC#Albums.  Esradekan Gibb  ^"Talk" 02:36, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to YTCracker (itself barely notable). I'm tempted to redirect right now. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:^simple/_complex 15:49, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Keep (Changed to redirect, still a pointy nomination)
  Clear violation of WP:POINT with a lot of WP:IDONTLIKEIT from the nom.
  Per WP:NALBUMS: "In general, if the musician or ensemble that recorded an album is considered notable, then officially released albums may have sufficient notability to have individual articles on Wikipedia."
  Theserialcomma's nominations of Nerdrap Entertainment System and The Digital Gangster LP for AfD are clearly intended to be disruptive and are a continuation of the disruption surrounding the YTCracker article. See: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#YTCracker
  YTCracker's article survived AfD and has been rewritten to include plenty of sources despite Theserialcomma's attempts to gut the article. [1] [2] [3]
  Theserialcomma continued to edit war over the YTCracker article even during the AfD [4] [5] [6]
  --Tothwolf (talk) 14:49, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My comment here applies equally on this page. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:^simple/_complex 15:00, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to YTcracker. Otherwise, there is very little, if anything, for independent notability. MuZemike 15:24, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to YTCracker per WLU and MuZemike until proper reviews are available. Tothwolf (talk) 13:04, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

STC IS THE GREATEST —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.169.195.238 (talk) 13:14, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.