The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to Nepal Mathematical Society. Vanamonde (talk) 13:03, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nepal Mathematical Society Newsletter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Small society (according to their own website they don't even have 100 members). No indication of any notability. Fails WP:GNG, WP:ORG, and WP:GNG. Non notable newsletter. No independent sources, not indexed anywhere. Not sure WP:NJournals applies, but in any case it isn't met. Also fails WP:GNG. (Apologies: earlier I copied the wrong deletion rationale, this is the correct one). Randykitty (talk) 21:14, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I'm not sure whether WP:NJournals applies given that this is a newsletter rather than a research journal. Nevertheless, we have no evidence of notability, neither through NJournals nor through GNG. It might be worth considering also whether Nepali Mathematical Sciences Report is notable. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:41, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:39, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:39, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:39, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Nepal Mathematical Society, completely non-notable.Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 09:18, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge as above. I was the original prod'der--no better sources found. --Finngall ^talk 13:43, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.