The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. W.marsh 22:54, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Neopets plots

[edit]

Listing of contested PROD. Delete as this seems to fall under the purview of WP:NOT an indiscriminate collection of information. For lack of better terms, this is ad nauseum fancruft/websitecruft. If others see this as encyclopedic, then it could/should be pared down significantly and merged (without actual deletion, of course) into the Neopets article. As it stands, however, there are too many short fragments with "see the actual thing"-style external linkage, the tone is hopelessly unencyclopedic, and I fail to see any reliable sources (i.e., not message boards, fansites, etc.) outside of the actual site which indicate why these plots are notable. --Kinu t/c 20:38, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep but edit. Plot results often result in website overhauls, & on a website with millions of users & millions of dollars in yearly revenue, that is notable. As a relatively recent internet phenomenon, reliable sources are sparse; primary source linking will have to carry the day. Step by step summaries of the plots are certainly un-needed, & should be given harsh trimming down. --mordicai. 21:09, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think that you should edit out content that doesn't help but should keep the article because of how much importance the plots have to the website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Superstormfanatic (talk • contribs) — Superstormfanatic (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

  • Keep with Overhaul (or at least lots of cleanup tags to note this is not exactly peoples' priority), or (second choice) Merge a list or summary into Neopets, and (in both cases) move/merge the article as it is now into a Neopets-specific wiki or three, where this detailed format might be more appreciated. —AySz88\^-^ 04:22, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
More