The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 16:58, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nelly de Vries-Lammerts

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Longevity is not a reason for inclusion here. Wikipedia is not a directory of longest living people Fiddle Faddle 10:31, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I think she does not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline..--Inception2010 (talk) 14:32, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:GNG as there is no significant coverage in reliable sources. The first source shouldn't actually be used because it's WP:OR to use a birth record. No need for a standalone article as all useful information about her is in List of Dutch supercentenarians. CommanderLinx (talk) 11:51, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Born, had children, died old. WP:NOPAGE EEng (talk) 14:31, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, with my condolences to the family of Ms. de Vries-Lammerts. There is a list article at List of supercentenarians who died in 2015, to which I've added the subject's name (see diff here). It bears noting that this list article shows that several of these supercentenarians have their own articles and the few that I've checked don't seem to have any greater claim to notability than the instant subject. NewYorkActuary (talk) 19:35, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:46, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:46, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails GNG. Age does not confer notability. Jbh ^Talk 20:15, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Merge or redirect to a relevant list of supercentenarians (perhaps List of Dutch supercentenarians) per WP:ATD. clpo13_(talk) 20:34, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Being the oldest anything does not, in and of itself confer automatic notability, which means that we must default to WP:N, and there is no evidence of the type of coverage that would satisfy that guideline. Canadian Paul 22:04, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't meet WP:GNG. -- Ollie231213 (talk) 16:38, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Merge Not enough information or included sources to justify a standalone article. However, a mini-bio could be included at List of Dutch supercentenarians. Bodgey5 (talk) 01:16, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.