The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:39, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Navigator Records (Russia)

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relevance is not shown. Sources are not reliable. In Russian Wikipedia, the article is in two lines and is submitted for deletion. It seems like the PR itself.--Jürgen Klinsmann1990 (talk) 02:54, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I edited the article earlier and tried to clean it up, but I couldn't find any refs to support WP:GNG. It's also telling that the Russian project has only one good source (talking to the label's president http://www.rollingstone.ru/social/interview/15341.html), and they could easily use Russian-language sources. Seems to be a niche label. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:01, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Prior to this relisting, this discussion wasn't transcluded on any AFD page. This has now been resolved, and it appears on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 April 26.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 19:22, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:18, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:18, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:55, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:55, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.