The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deletion (G11). (Non-admin closure) AllyD (talk) 16:30, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Naveen JaiHind (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is very poorly written, doesn't exactly pass WP:N, and the only two sources are Twitter and Facebook. 『Woona』_{Dear Celestia...} 13:25, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete this article has no 3rd party sources to prove notability and the article itself is written in a very promotional way.--Jeffrd10 (talk) 13:41, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.