The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The significant amount of media coverage seemingly establishes enough notability for inclusion. Regards, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 17:57, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

National Hug Day (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined speedy/contested WP:PROD. Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:07, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Yes, it exists: [1]. Warrah (talk) 20:05, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Warrah; it is not new and is notable. Bearian (talk) 02:10, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I never said it didn't exist, but the coverage is minimal and of a trivial nature, and I doubt any government recognizes it as a real holiday. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:42, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - media coverage above is extensive and meets WP:GNG. Werner Heisenberg (talk) 02:53, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - utterly trivial. Bazonka (talk) 22:12, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.