The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz ^talk 01:41, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

National Football League in Toronto (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Procedural nom - was nominated for SD as a recreation of a previously deleted article. While it is (superficially, at least), the article is different enough that I didn't think speedying it was the way to go. Perhaps the biggest difference is that the current article is fairly well sourced, whereas the previous article was nothing but WP:CRYSTAL and WP:OR. Still, I figured it was a close enough call that another AfD was called for - I have no strong opinion on whether it should be kept. faithless (^speak) 11:19, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep While anything before 2008 could not have been much more than crystalballing, things have changed since the last article. The NFL is, for the first time, playing a regular-season game in Canada (though it has played preseason games in Canada before) and leasing arrangements for games in subsequent years. Mandsford (talk) 16:25, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Concur with Mandsford. - BillCJ (talk) 20:38, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Per Mandsford. I have nothing to say which is not repetitive. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 21:58, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. In addition to Mandsford's comments, I'd like to add that the article also discusses the NFL's previous involvement (which is fairly extensive) in the city, and not just a speculation on future games. The article is worth keeping. J. Myrle Fuller (talk) 21:32, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:38, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:38, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep article with reliable sources. Throw out league. DoubleBlue (Talk) 01:23, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.