The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by nominator. Most of the sources mentioned listed by the sockpuppet below are not independent, third-party mentions, but the coverage in El Pais, Midi Libre and La Gazette de Montpellier is sufficient. rʨanaɢ (talk) 17:04, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nath-Sakura

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Artist does not appear to meet the notability guidelines described in WP:ARTIST; I can't find any major reviews of her work in independent (English or French) publications, and while she has apparently been involved in numerous exhibitions I don't know if any of them are "significant exhibitions". The creator of this article and the primary editor of the fr-wiki article on which this is based, User:Suzie-One, is likely to either be the article subject or someone closely related to her, given that this is the only subject she edits on en-wiki, the main subject she edits on fr-wiki, and that she uploaded File:Nathalia-aout2006d.jpg, a self-portrait of this artist, claiming it as "own work". rʨanaɢ (talk) 21:37, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In France and Spain, the artists are formally referenced when participating in auctions in official establishments. But the fact that many artists go through different networks. They are considered artists néamoins by the French government because they pay a monthly fee and are referenced by the Agessa services and / or the House of Artists. This discussion therefore has no place. In addition, major exhibitions that Nath-Sakura attended throughout Europe testify to his credibility. In two minutes of research I find on the net, a recent article in the largest newspaper in southern France, which supports this article. Read here: http://www.midilibre.fr/2011/05/04/nath-sakura-accroche-son-art-decale-au-sexy-au-chai-du-terral,313730.php 15:19 (GMT+1), 23 June 2011

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Suzie-One (talk • contribs)

That article does seem to offer some good coverage. I would still like to hear input from other editors. rʨanaɢ (talk) 16:52, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that there is good enough explicit references in this article to detain him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Victoria2005 (talk • contribs) 16:39, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

— Victoria2005 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. rʨanaɢ (talk) 16:51, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There are no references in the article. rʨanaɢ (talk) 16:52, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is references :

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.