The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Please continue redirect discussion on article talk page. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 15:39, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nataline Sarkisyan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As horrible as it always is when a kid dies, even more so of a potential fault in treatment, there is nothing indicating that this person meets WP:BIO. -Lilac Soul ^{(Talk • Contribs)} 09:19, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep I think the incident involving the insurance is notable, but probably not the person. Whether you create a new page for the incident or just reduce this page and improve the sourcing, I am not sure. I am not convinced it is a total delete though DRosin (talk) 17:53, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Cigna per WP:EVENT. The event is what is notable and it is outlined there. Location (talk) 22:35, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep This is a pretty notable case. Yes, it's a contemporary event, but the events surrounding her death did generate a large amount of publicity in the United States. That said, it would be good to see it written in a more biographical format. gloin (talk) 06:51, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I don't care for the rules in this case. Purging her memory from Wikipedia is our equivalent (and validation) of Cigna's decision and is completely inappropriate. Wefa (talk) 16:11, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Cigna. The event is notable, the child is not. Edward321 (talk) 00:19, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Per what objective standard? gloin (talk) 07:39, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.