The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-04-26 07:40Z

Nancy Beard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

As per a discussion on Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Ice_Hockey it is felt that just because a persons name is inscribed on the Stanley Cup (NHL championship trophy) they do not warrant their own article unless they were an actual player on the team. This particular person was a secretary for the team. I feel this does not make her notable enough to be on wikipedia as his own article, and instead intend to create a list of the people on the trophy that were "staff" members on the winning teams to cover their inclusion in wikipedia. Djsasso 15:35, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. She is just a secretary. Resolute 16:29, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. --Nick—^Contact/_Contribs 18:28, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The small amount of detail in this article, if notable, can be included at Stanley Cup#Women on the Cup (which, incidentally, contradicts this article with regard to the number of women named on the cup). EALacey 19:01, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Delete: fails WP:V, WP:BIO. Jesu-christo, it was bad enough that assistant equipment managers were put on the Cup, but secretaries in the team office? The NHL had better get a grip on this nonsense. Peter Pocklington putting his dad on the Cup doesn't look quite so outrageous in retrospect.  RGTraynor  20:07, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per discussion at WP:HOCKEY --Pparazorback 23:31, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Banish into Martin Brodeur's glove, as per above. Sorry, trying to sound witty. Croat Canuck Go Leafs Go 00:53, 23 April 2007 (UTC)`[reply]
• Delete Per comments by Resolute. I'd say banish into Brodeur's glove, but that's going to fail soon enough :). Jmlk17 07:33, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.