The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:30, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nahh... Nahh Mofo

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article appears to be hoax; only Google reference is one Wordpress blog. ⁓ Hello 71 18:14, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

While Facebook isn't a reliable source, the MelvinVanPeebleswidLaxative facebook page, which seems to have a bit of a following, posted that "The cat is out of the bag! Melvin Van Peebles released a new album for his 80th birthday party earlier this week, on vinyl only! There are still some copies available at a special (Van Peebles-decided!) price and pending (Van Peebles) approval, particularly looking for DJ types and such ..." It may just be an incredibly limited release vinyl (as the page implies)... or just a complete hoax. I'll keep hunting. Theo polisme _:) 18:32, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:05, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. May not be a hoax, but I'm unable to find coverage in reliable sources; does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NALBUMS. Gongshow ^Talk 03:08, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Gongshow - regardless of hoax or not, doesn't meet WP:GNG. Theo polisme 11:09, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.