The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 10:01, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Naha City Gallery and Apartment House

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable architectural project. Although the project's creator (1100 Architect) appears notable, this particular project does not. The only source outside of the architect's own website is a listing at Archdaily.com, a website that accepts user project submissions for publication. (See ArchDaily Contact.) WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 19:32, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also appears to be covered in this book about the architects [1], for what that might be worth. --Arxiloxos (talk) 19:45, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A book about the architectural firm would presumably include a compendium of the firm's projects. Again, this makes the firm notable, but not the individual projects. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 19:49, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:04, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:04, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Agree with proposer that this one isn't notable. See WP:Articles for deletion/Brand New School Office, Los Angeles for more comments. —SMALL JIM 11:31, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not seeing any third-party sourcing or in-depth coverage to indicate notability. --DAJF (talk) 13:21, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - There's no doubt that the architectural firm is notable, but notability does not extend to its projects. However, a merge or redirect may be possible, since the article could still be a possible search term. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:38, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.