The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:09, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nadine Dajani

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP that has been unsourced for six and a half years. No significant coverage found. The only claim of notability in the article is writing a 'popular novel'. Michig (talk) 09:11, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is a Romantic Times Online review of her first novel, apparently also reviewed in "Library Journal", but I am not finding anything to meet the WP:AUTHOR criteria. AllyD (talk) 10:40, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 16:26, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 16:26, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 16:26, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete In addition to Romantic Times and Library Journal, there is Publishers Weekly, Publishers Weekly, Booklist. That's 5 reviews. Not bad, but there are no opinion reviews in newspapers, just trade summary reviews, and no GNG coverage. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 19:32, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.