The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Both arguments to delete are not grounded in policy - just WP:JNN arguments. Closing as keep because there were actual policy-based arguments to keep the article. (non-admin closure)Bmusician 01:44, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Naarot Reines (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable No refs INeverCry 01:09, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 08:32, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 08:32, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - not notable--Shrike (talk) 09:07, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the nomination appears to base topic notability upon whether or not sources were in the article; hence the speedy keep. Per WP:NRVE, topic notability is about the availability of sources, not whether or not they are in articles. See also WP:IMPERFECT and WP:PRESERVE.
Northamerica1000(talk) 01:11, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.