The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as WP:G5: creation by sock in violation of block, with no significant edits by others. Primefac (talk) 15:31, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: ((subst:spa|username)); suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)); accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)).

NKN (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lowkey press release for yet another non-notable cryptocurrency software. All sources presented are either press releases or comes from unreliable, non-compelling crypto blogs and websites. WP:BEFORE turns up the same stuff. Virtually no coverage in any form of media outside of the aforementioned crypto blogs and audience specific sites. Sulfurboy (talk) 03:49, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Sulfurboy (talk) 03:49, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I think the main merit of this entry is that NKN's consensus algorithm represent a new school of technical adavance that are based on Cellular Automata in order to solve the scalability of many nodes instead of transaction per second. Other notable projects in this space is IOTA and Coordicide, and Near Protocol. And this technical challenge has been well spelled out in Dr. Stephen Wolfram's analysis. "Stephen Wolfram (Creator of NKS) Tries to Understand NKN" [1].

In addition, coindesk is the most reputable news outlet in blockchain and cryptocurrency. And their report on NKN and iQIYI in video platform contract is a valid reference. Sebastian Sinclair (2020-04-14). "Baidu-Owned Video Streaming Giant iQiyi Taps Public Blockchain for Performance Boost". [2]. Zbruceli(talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:47, 18 May 2020 (UTC) — Zbruceli (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Keep I'd like to note that the GSMA case-study is neither a non-reputable source, nor a press release. It's a case-study - going into fine detail on how the NKN Software worked with iQIYI (China's largest video streaming platform) and even out-performed existing content delivery offerings. GSMA are a hugely creditable association of hundreds of telecom and mobile providers globally, and share their findings and news with these members. GSMA - Future Networks: NKN Case Study [3] OMTom (talk) 17:08, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

— OMTom (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

• Delete. Blockchain vaporware that doesn't even make sense, created by a sockpuppet of another user who was blocked for spamming the same thing. ST47 (talk) 17:40, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment ST47, the two above spa accounts will likely need to be checked too.
• Comment I respect wiki mods spending their personal time to maintain the quality of wikipedia. NKN is lesser known, which is clear, but it does not warrant a label of "vaporware". And the developers have toiled over the last two years creating the following (just facts, no PR): over 1 million line of new source code on the GitHub NKN core repository [4]. Over 14,000 community nodes running in 42 countries and regions NKN explorer and network map [5]. And in addition, with the GSMA reference and coindesk reference, the network is used by legitimate multi-national businesses. Zbruceli (talk)

• Comment Vapourware is a very poor description for NKN. They're one of the few telecom startup companies which has a simple but field-disruptive idea, multiple working products (free to test in browser), and multiple signed clients. They have given talks at Tsinghua University <ref>NKN Technical Seminar in Tsinghua University [6] (the top ranked University in China), Global Digital Economy Summit in China, and also at Blockchain Connect Conference in San Francisco, to name a few. If there's anything unclear, or if you believe the Wiki article needs to be brought down to a simpler reading level to be valid, I'd be more than happy to contribute and make it so. If there's anything in particular you'd like to see in response here, to show how far NKN is from "yet another non-notable cryptocurrency software", I'd love to help there too. OMTom (talk) 21:01, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  OMTom, Please do not vote multiple times. Sulfurboy (talk) 22:12, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• delete does not meet notability requirements in terms of reliable secondary sources independent of subject. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 03:13, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• comment only keep votes are from a) a newly created account whose sole purpose has been to make a non-policy based keep vote on this afd and b) an spa account whose only edits outside of the afd have been to the article in question (this is not neccesarily a bad thing). I wouldn't at all be suprised if the former account is a sockpuppet. Tknifton (talk) 11:53, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.