The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE j⚛e decker ^talk 02:00, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

N-v-t distinction

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page describes a non-notable theory – really just a minor tweak to T–V distinction. The article cites only primary sources, the paper in which the term was coined and two English translations of that work. Further, I could find only one paper not written by M. Cook which refers to that work. Fails WP:GNG. Cnilep (talk) 06:28, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Cnilep (talk) 06:31, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Linguistics-related deletion discussions. — Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 14:19, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 00:06, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.