The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WjBscribe 02:07, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mythical chickens (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This is the single most reluctant XfD I have ever nominated as it's the best title for a disambig page ever. I would absolutely love to have a pretext for keeping this page up, and if anyone can find a good keep argument I beg you to give it. Unfortunately, I can't find one - and not a single one of these entries is actually about a chicken. But if anyone's planning to form a band, I have the perfect name for you. - iridescenti (talk to me!) 22:09, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I only created this article to get this nonsense out of the Chicken article, which was a hopeless and over-long mish-mash anyway and is now, at best, a mish-mash of shorter length and with some potential. Delete, don't delete -- not bothered either way. Just so long as it doesn't get dumped back into Chicken, I don't really care. Cheers, Neale Neale Monks 22:15, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes but you made a huge mistake - this article should be entitled Chicken Myths, not Mythical chickens. Your title only encompasses actual chickens, not the chicken-related. For shame. CitiCat 23:15, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Aren't you breaching policy by treating the half-house-half-chicken as a "myth"? I think to preserve NPOV, there needs to be a mention of people who believe it really happened. - iridescenti (talk to me!) 00:21, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as an assortment of trivia -- Whpq 22:40, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, but if I create a band named The Mythical Chickens will the fact it is named after a deleted Wikipediea page make it notable? Is a deleted page a source? Alas, probably not.--killing sparrows 00:12, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - If you do and someone AfD's the page, rest assured I'll be voting keep - iridescenti (talk to me!) 00:21, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Solution. I moved the contents to the page Mythological things at least in part based on chickens which I think better describes its contents. Expand and enjoy. Oh, and we can probably delete the Mythical chickens page now, if that's OK. Cheers, Neale Neale Monks 11:24, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As long as noone chickens out of doing it - iridescenti (talk to me!) 16:27, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, its now a redirect to Mythological things at least in part based on chickens pending then discovery of a funk-thrash metal crossover band from Ulan Baator or some-such *actually* known as the Mythical chickens. Cheers, Neale Neale Monks 17:13, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If that happened, we'd have egg on our faces - iridescenti (talk to me!) 17:35, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. None of them are actually chickens and there's no real connection between the things on the list. It is a great idea for a page, it's just a pity there's no true encyclopaedic content can be put on it. Sam Blacketer 17:17, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.