The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (non-admin closure), as bravura editing by Eastmain and Paul Erik saved the day and established notability. Ecoleetage (talk) 00:09, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Myca[edit]

I believe the company fails relevant notability requirements. Borderline spam and no indication of reliable third-party coverage: Ghits are either from the company's website, associated companies' websites or press releases. Pichpich (talk) 16:14, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - doesn't appear to pass WP:COMPANY or WP:RS and does indeed read like WP:SPAM. Mmmmm... Spam. -- JediLofty ^User_Talk 16:26, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep After the recent alterations I'd say the article now passes both WP:COMPANY and WP:RS. God job, folks! -- JediLofty ^User_Talk 08:34, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions.
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.
Keep. When an article lacks references from reliable sources, it is a good idea to do an archive search at http://news.google.com or (in this case, since the company is based in Canada) http://news.google.ca I was able to find some coverage in a number of Canadian newspapers, and I added some references to the article. Interesting, the Canadian coverage of this company is somewhat critical, mentioning that a virtual consultation can be less useful than a physical visit, whereas the U.S. coverage is uncritical. In any event, I think that notability has now been established with the new references. --Eastmain (talk) 19:03, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – There appears to be enough third-party coverage to establish WP:GNG notability. I also added a Washington Times article as a source. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 21:36, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Eastmain and Paul Erik's additions - I note also that the company's product MyFoodPhone (now Myca Nutrition) has certainly been the subject of significant third-party coverage, with write-ups in The Washington Post, Wired magazine, et al. Also coverage of the recent "Hello Health" initiative in a Wall Street Journal blog. Gr1st (talk) 21:47, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.