The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Daniel (talk) 00:39, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Muzeum Miniaturowej Sztuki Profesjonalnej Henryk Jan Dominiak in Tychy[edit]

Muzeum Miniaturowej Sztuki Profesjonalnej Henryk Jan Dominiak in Tychy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is not a G4, but issues and sourcing raised at the prior AfD don't appear to have changed. The promotional tone wouldn't be as much of an issue with independent sourcing to address it. Star Mississippi 13:02, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Museums and libraries and Poland. Star Mississippi 13:02, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Same as last time, primary sourcing or non RS sites. Oaktree b (talk) 16:38, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Such a lack of sources that the first 3 are a primary site, wiki mirrors and the NYT search that shows it has no coverage in the newspaper. Oaktree b (talk) 16:40, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:26, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. Cross wiki promotional spam, yes. That said, this survived an AfD on pl wiki that I started a while back (pl:Wikipedia:Poczekalnia/artykuły/2022:05:30:Muzeum Miniaturowej Sztuki Profesjonalnej Henryk Jan Dominiak w Tychach) with the majority there concluding that despite the tiny size etc. it is officially recognixzed and listed on the lists of museums supported by the pl gov't. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:47, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 16:57, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 22:56, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: are our notability standards more stringent than those of the 45 other language wikis that have a page about this government-accredited museum? The poor writing and sloppy sourcing are certainly making it difficult to endorse the article in its current form, but that's an argument for rewriting, not deleting.it. Owen× ☎ 00:09, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.