The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Opabinia regalis (talk) 00:37, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mustoi Balouch

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. I have not done a search of non-English sources but with that limitation there is almost nothing out there that mentions this tribe. What does, and is reliable, comprises passing mentions about individuals who were victims of sex crimes etc rather than about the tribe. Sitush (talk) 17:16, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related page because it is an older version of the same topic, with the same notability problems:

Delete both. Fails WP:GNG and WP:V. Originally an orphaned article from the "let's add to Wikipedia some badly written local stuff nobody outside my [red linked] village somewhere in rural Pakistan knows about"-department; improvements to date have been mostly trimming away excess text about non-notable clan members etc. I originally nominated this for prod, but that was declined through technicality. Keep an eye for any copies and socks as this was pushed somewhat aggressively to WP. If this somehow survives, then I think Mastoi needs to be a redirect to Mustoi or other way around. jni ^(delete)_{...just not interested} 17:46, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both articles. No sources on either, and can't find sources that would confirm notability. Fyddlestix (talk) 17:01, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:12, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:12, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:12, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.