The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Rlendog (talk) 16:14, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Muse Art Gallery (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has an interesting history. It was written in the main by the curator, and looks to be very much a promotional vehicle to advertise the gallery. That editor then himself removed the speedy deletion tag on 'his own' article. Even so the gallery itself has laudable ambitions. Despite the numerous mentions in sundry media I'm not sure that it is actually notable, though the Marriott parentage may be sufficient notability. Many of the mentions seem to be 'mentions in passing' so to speak.

So, since I am not sure, I'm asking the community to look at the article with care, not to be bamboozled by the number of references, but to follow them (and consider removing irrelevant ones so that the wood may be seen from the trees here), and to reach a consensus about whether it should remain, and, indeed, in what form. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 21:20, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 23:33, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If Microsoft Employees get to gether and do an photo show and raise money for charity and that was in the news in a prominent news paper is this a passing mention ? http://www.deccanchronicle.com/tabloid/potpouri/confluenceof-empathy-375.
(Gregx1872 (talk) 04:16, 14 February 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:54, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 17:00, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have gone ahead and done a lot of cleanup, removed puff words and "exhibitions" for which no reliable references were found.Hope it is now upto WP standards.Vivekananda De--tAlK 15:25, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.