The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Favonian (talk) 21:10, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Murtaza Bagwala

[edit]
Murtaza Bagwala (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual. THere are no reliable independent sources with significant coverage. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:30, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It should not be deleted because it is all about innovation what college students is doing in terms of an IT.And what i have written all are correct and authenticated — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bagwalamurtaza (talkcontribs) 20:47, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:47, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:48, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:48, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep.It is Notable because if the top news papers of India i.e(Times of India and Nai Duniya) is publishing about him then it should be notable.It is not about the college project but it is all about the innovation . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bagwalamurtaza (talkcontribs) 10:04, 9 February 2014 (UTC) *Keep.It is Notable because references justify it and I had also read article about him in news papers of India. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bagwalamurtaza (talkcontribs) 10:04, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You've already made your opinion known above. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 01:41, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.