The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist 03:13, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mumtaz Ali Kazi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:GNG. I could not locate reliable sources to support the information written in the article. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 05:31, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment> Keep. Certainly does not pass WP:Prof#C1 on basis of GS research citations. May pass WP:Politician or WP:Prof#C3 . Xxanthippe (talk) 01:40, 29 January 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:48, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:48, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.