The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep. Non good-faith nomination. (non-admin closure) WikiPuppies! (bark) 21:37, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Muammar Gaddafi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

he is very bad man and their should be no article he very bad and evil bad man BillyFromPeru (talk) 21:22, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep and close as a WP:POINT violation. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 21:25, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep and close There's not even a question about this man's notoriety, irregardless of personal feelings. Joefridayquaker (talk) 21:32, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete because he is bad man BillyFromPeru (talk) 21:35, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.