The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 09:03, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Moulvi Syed Qudratullah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Historical scholarship does not document, much less discuss, our subject except as marginalia when discussing a bazaar he had founded which eventually expanded into a town. None of the references in this article are about our subject. As per the rules of Wikipedia, notability is not herited and therefore as there is no sign of independent notability of our subject, this article should be deleted. Jaunpurzada (talk) 15:00, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bangladesh and India. -- Jaunpurzada (talk) 15:00, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep- the article is adequately sourced. See the Bangla Tribune article for example. It is in the article and it is about the subject which raises questions about the statement "None of the references in this article are about our subject".Vinegarymass911 (talk) 20:27, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:18, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:18, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete As per nom notability is not herited and lacks indepth references.Lankanrhino (talk) 22:25, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:59, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I could not anything that I would qualify as WP:SIGCOV to meet GNG or any other notability standard. Jacona (talk) 15:27, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.