The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: Speedily deleted under WP:CSD A1. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 16:53, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moreno Valley Mall

[edit]

Very short, barely even stub article on a mall in California. A search online turned up no reliable soures, which actually seems unusual for a center of its size. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 00:27, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malls-related deletions. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 00:28, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The article has been a stub since February 2005. If there were indeed anything notable about the the mall, then it ought to have been added by now. And as it's only a very short stub anyway, it can very easily be rewritten and expanded on by any editor with the inclination to make a case for the notability of this mall. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 00:38, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete Yep, this mall exists (I live in Moreno Valley). But how would you make an article out of a mall? I'd like to know this. Right now, my vote's a "weak delete" mainly because there are other malls with articles and I guess that's why this one got made, but I'm not sure how any mall merits an article. JuJube (talk) 07:32, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete But JuJube, I have to say -- there's a science behind malls, with a lot of money at stake, and some properties like Westfield Horton Plaza are important from that standpoint, not to mention the value of Mall of America just as obscene spectacle. --Lockley (talk) 10:20, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:V and WP:NOTE. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 19:36, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Super regional (>1M sq.ft) with the unusual fact that on duty police officers provide security services, not a 'for hire' service, which is the norm. Exit2DOS2000^•T•C• 05:43, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Exit2DOS, I see no harm in the retention of this article. RFerreira (talk) 05:56, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep notable as a super-regional mall with an unusual backstory. (jarbarf) (talk) 05:46, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.