The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete. Hoaxes are vandalism. Also I suspect this may be an obscure attack page against someone bearing the name this was cut and pasted into. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:11, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Moin Sayed (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Okay, this contributor has only made 4 edits, but this page contains an incorrect protection tag, and looks too "high quality" for the average "first article". This page may be a cut and paste move from somewhere in Wikipedia, a GFDL violation

Username may also suggest an conflict of interest. ViperSnake151 14:55, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete It is indeed a copy/paste of Kimbo Slice, and as such, should be deleted as blatant vandalism. TNXMan 14:57, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Just came to say the same thing; I didn't initially realise this and couldn't understand why such a fine-looking article had been marked as vandalism. I think this ought to be speedied. Skomorokh 14:59, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've nominated it for speedy deletion. Umbralcorax (talk) 15:03, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.