The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, fails WP:NEO. KrakatoaKatie 13:04, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Modern Gallae (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Appears to lack any cites to independent reliable sources required by the attribution policy. Google hits seem to be mostly from Wikipedia mirrors. Karada 22:07, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• comment - seems to be almost a neologism. With additional ref's could be fine (if odd subject). Ghits is a poor indicator of notability (under my real name I show up with lots of hits and I am totally un-notable). --Rocksanddirt 22:16, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, fails WP:N and WP:NEO. Nothing in Google News Archive, one result in Google Books, a very limited mention.[1] --Dhartung | Talk 22:43, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete also per WP:NEO, unless sources are found to prove otherwise Corpx 00:00, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete neologism -- Roleplayer 00:00, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.