The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 19:37, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Model Driven Offshore (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

• Delete nn neologism per WP:NEO only two GHITS Mayalld (talk) 10:05, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wizardman 16:44, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. It's probably a valid concept, but with topics like this there *must* be google hits if it has any notability. --Amalthea^Talk 13:24, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 14:04, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 22:50, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Proto/neo-logism. It is a variation on Model Driven Architecture (as stated in the article), which is a registered trademark [1] of OMG. ~ Ningauble (talk) 23:34, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.