The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:45, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Haq Home

[edit]
Miss Haq Home (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable organization, fails WP:NORG. Störm (talk) 19:32, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:34, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:34, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MelanieN (talk) 00:05, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • [1] is an obituary that mentions Miss Haq Home once.
  • [2] appears to be an organization directly associated with Miss Haq Home
  • [3] (2011 archive) has no indication that it is a reliable source
  • [4] only mentions the Miss Haq Home once; may be associated with it
Of the sources I found:
  • [5] claims Miss Haq Home is a well-known institute and covers the subject, but it is a blog post.
I do not believe this is enough coverage to meet WP:GNG or WP:NORG. userdude 06:07, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.