- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America1000 21:32, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Mimi Super Market (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There are not enough description about the notability of the article. It is not able to fulfill WP:Places of local interest criteria. There are several shopping malls like that such well known in Chittagong, but all of them are not notable per Wikipedia:LOCAL. ~ Moheen (talk) 03:36, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 04:12, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 19:03, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- support to delete. Kayser Ahmad (talk) 03:42, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and no merge as there's simply nothing at all to suggest better, either for keeping by history logs with the merge or keeping entirely. Nothing for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 00:23, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The quality of sources and their depth do not convincingly demonstrate WP:GEOFEAT notability. The only content available to be merged is the name. Featured articles about locations mention specific shopping malls only if they are the largest, oldest, or otherwise distinctive. Nothing in the sources sets this apart from the other ten or so run-of-the-mill shopping centers in the Panchlaish Thana area of the city, so not worth merging. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:28, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Per nom and Worldbruce. - Mar11 (talk) 09:56, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.