- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. per WP:SNOW. (Nomination withdrawn). (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:38, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Milyang No clan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unable to find any sources that verify this clan exists. Atsme📞📧 01:38, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by nominator
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:41, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:41, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Hello Atsme, how are you doing? In Korea, Milyang is often called Miryang. The current source in the article[1] contains reference to the Miryang No clan, in other words, to the Milyang No clan. This should have been clarified in the article for reader support I guess. More sources can be found if one searches for the mirror name. Wikipedia being a gazetteer, I would prefer to Keep this article on this clan, unless you prefer otherwise. I'll go by your discretion. Warmly, Lourdes 02:50, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- You are free to add the sources needed to substantiate notability and also update the article. If you do that, Lourdes, I will be happy to withdraw my nom. Atsme📞📧 02:55, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Modern Korean (한국어)
- 인구분포 2000년 통계청이 발표한 결과에 의하면 밀양노씨는 391가구 총 1,268명이 있는 것으로 되어 있다.
- English
- Statistics Korea research held in 2000, the number of Milyang No clan was 1268.--Spirit of criticism (talk) 05:42, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Atsme hello once more, I've filled in the article with some material from the available references. Thanks, Lourdes 08:08, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.