The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Mediran (t • c) 03:32, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Milton S. Eisenhower Foundation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable organization, no real news/web/book citations. See also Alan Curtis (criminologist) which I have also nominated for deletion Gaijin42 (talk) 19:06, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. czar · · 19:09, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. czar · · 19:09, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep or redirect to Kerner Commission. Note that there's a separate, unrelated Eisenhower Foundation located at [1]. After taking out the results for that one, there aren't really any sources dedicated to the subject, but it is brought up a lot in relation to the Kerner Commission [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] — Frankie (talk) 19:48, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Back in 2007 I stubbified the article to remove copyvio. I urge taking a look at the previous version to see what else could be said, if someone were willing to write it properly. DGG ( talk ) 23:30, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Just clicking on the Gnews link reveals enough coverage of their activities to qualify under WP:ORG. That said, since a lot of it seems to be grant-giving and the like, I dunno how good an article we can get. It may stay a decent semi-permastub, which is not really a problem. Ray^Talk 19:50, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - not a famous, but a notable, commission. There are plenty of available sources that could be added to the article to bring it up to 'start' status. Bearian (talk) 17:47, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.