The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kevin (talk) 05:21, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Punter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

His only published work doesn't doesn't bring up anything, he is a "visiting lecturer" so this may be borderline. Main problem is so far everything is unverifiable, possible vanity article. Pirate^Argh!!1! 08:50, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete. Description in bio seems verifiable, but still seems to fall a bit short of "professor test". A couple minor plays that do not appear widely produced or published and an academic appointment. LotLE×talk 08:57, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:19, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Seems insufficient for notability. Xxanthippe (talk) 09:13, 25 November 2009 (UTC).[reply]
• Delete, per nom. Nsk92 (talk) 14:13, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.