The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The Academy Is.... --Core desat 06:49, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Carden

[edit]

The article appears to fail Wikipedia:Notability (music) and there are no reliable sources cited only the subjects blogs / live journals and various interviews in other blogs. Dual Freq 02:38, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am of two minds on this: either Keep and expand, since The Academy Is... passes WP:N, or Redirect to The Academy Is..., if individual band members need not be kept. --tennisman 03:18, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

keep orRedirect to the Academy Is... the Academy definately is notable per the guidelines... and while the article is bad, WP:MUSIC 1 "Has credit for writing or co-writing either lyrics or music for a musician or ensemble that qualifies above" He is given credit for many of their songs. So he clearly meets it as well... but I agree, this is a reluctant keep at best.Balloonman 03:40, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- I support redirection to the band article, subject doesn't seem notable independent of the band. --Dual Freq 14:20, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 08:13, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 08:13, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and redirect; It is NN as it stands (in my opinion). --Stormbay 00:25, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.