The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 04:08, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Migration of Kambojas

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural nomination. ((Hoax)) tag has been on article for several weeks with no action taken to delete article or refute hoax claim. Article appears to be synthesis essay. KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:55, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- -SpacemanSpiff 04:08, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Question While the article is indeed a sythesysed mashup of primarly sources; Is there nothing salvageable in this article that would warrant a keep? --Deepak D'Souza (talk) 08:36, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think probably not. If you would have time to look through some more Kamboja-related articles you will see that there has been a consistent use of them to push a fringe view that the Kambojas created virtually the whole of Asian history. It is nationalist POV-pushing on a vast scale. They do seem to have been an important tribe and are thus mentioned frequently in some texts and epigraphy, but ridiculous claims are being made about them. Itsmejudith (talk) 23:25, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fine enough. I want very well acquainted with the history of Kambojas so I thought I'll ask for someone who knew it. --Deepak D'Souza (talk) 10:20, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as patent POV pushing and synthesis with no salvageable content. A closer look is at the other related articles is appropriate and required, if not for AfDing, at least for trimming to neutral versions. -SpacemanSpiff 05:10, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note I have marked ((Kambojas)) for deletion here. -SpacemanSpiff 05:14, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As a POV fork from more factual Kamboja articles. Priyanath ^talk 17:09, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as POV fork. Abecedare (talk) 07:32, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as original research, synthesis of primary non-academic sources and POV. --Deepak D'Souza (talk) 10:20, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.