The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. A move can be handled editorially. Star Mississippi 14:09, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Midlands Today (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I see no claim of significance. My BEFORE search found this Coventry website, BusinessLive, and this mere mention and I still don't see enough for WP:GNG. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:21, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and England. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:21, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:12, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Move: We would probably move to BBC Midlands Today since BBC regional news since many articles have the BBC prefix in it. Akhil K. (talk) 18:46, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Rillington (talk) 09:12, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I see no justification for this article's deletion, It is a significant regional news programme and contains independent references. Rillington (talk) 09:12, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 11:33, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. There's enough coverage in the sources already in the article and these further sources to pass the GNG: A look back over the first 50 years of the programme is SIGCOV.[1]. Brief comment on new look [2]. Changes to the set [3] and similar. [4] Suzanne Virdee leaving [5]. Mentions in this book [6] Agree with title change to BBC Midlands Today. Rupples (talk) 04:07, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.