The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:04, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Methal Pertiwi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Proposed for deletion as non-notable comic book but already deleted once so in the past (at Methal pertiwi) so brought here. Delete for lack of coverage. Tikiwont (talk) 20:08, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as completely non-notable. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 20:40, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No evidence of notability. No reliable sources at all. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:46, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as article fails notability criteria for books. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 13:34, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-notable comic series. Sources aren't reliable. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 17:53, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:39, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as non-notable. Joaquin008 ^(talk) 16:43, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.