The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:09, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mentz family (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This is a genealogical article about a family which is not notable in the Wikipedia sense, and many of this sort of article have been deleted recently for exactly the same reason BoxCount | Talk 17:59, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• comment no real claim of notability, or reliable sources (all references are to mentaclan.com, except for two, one of which is www.fonebiz.co.uk/free-mobile-phone-ringtones/wiki.php?title=Mainz - I don't think free ringtone sites qualify as reliable sources). Pete.Hurd 22:11, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete There is a precedent to disqualify genealogical research. Placeholder account 04:00, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Arbuthnot. DewiMorgan 21:02, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The precedent was by a Wikipedian who created many dozens and dozens of articles with genealogical data, low quality, full of red links and mutual redirects. Cleanup was a non-trivial and took lot of time. Pavel Vozenilek 03:08, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.