The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eagles 24/7 (C) 06:37, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Melinda Anderson

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Author apparently notable for one book only. Google search doesn't turn up any reviews for the book or any interviews for the author. Fails WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 14:17, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Just found the following in the New York Times [1]. Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 14:57, 22 May 2011 (UTC) Half asleep here. Article concerned her co-author Kathleen Murray. Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 15:03, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Author of a non-notable book. Pburka (talk) 17:06, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A one-book author can certainly be notable if there is substantial WP:RS about the book. Margaret Mitchell published only one book, but there are, uhm, tons of articles about it. Unfortunately, there is nothing to indicated that Melinda Anderson or her book satisfy WP:AUTHOR or WP:BK through WP:RS. Qworty (talk) 22:16, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, doesn't appear to meet WP:BK - only published work is a redlinked book that she collaborated with another on. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 01:05, 29 May 2011 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.