The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. GirthSummit _(blether) 11:17, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Meitar Liquornik Geva Leshem Tal

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Highly promotional page, poorly cited and void of any indication of notability. Lists clients, lists competencies, lists business transactions and employees, but no actual content. Fails WP:NCORP. FalconK (talk) 00:53, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. FalconK (talk) 00:53, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. FalconK (talk) 00:53, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. FalconK (talk) 00:53, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, highly promotional article with no inline citations, all that's out there are promotional puff pieces and primary sources, and as a result this fails WP:NCORP. Devonian Wombat (talk) 12:32, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.