The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 23:51, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Another article that sucks poop! MegaDuck and Cougar Boy don't yield many google hits. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kittyslasher (talk • contribs) .

• Delete. Unnotable game console. -- | Page | contact 03:34, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note that this is a sock of Nintendude, as confirmed by Checkuser. --Rory096 22:48, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. If there were a page for Game Boy Pirate clones, I'd say merge into that...but there isn't. --Bill (who is cool!) 03:45, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I read about the MegaDuck and Cougar Boy on other websites, and the documentation claims that the 2 systems have different pin setups; therefore making them technically different systems that are not Game Boy pirate clones; but only similar systems. I concure with Bill (Who is cool); so delete. Also concur with my friend Kittyslasher. --Nintendude ^{userpage | message} 03:53, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Useless article.--Qwertyca 07:56, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, nn. --Terence Ong 14:11, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 18:27, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 18:27, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.