The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 00:11, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Media bias in India[edit]

Media bias in India (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was created by a contributor who has since been community banned for producing articles of this type. It is an unencyclopaedic small collection of loosely connected statements which do not even all consider media bias. It is poorly referenced and was previously the subject of a delete decision at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Media bias in India.

It is no great secret that the media is biased everywhere, if only because of human nature, and so without some substantial work the article is merely stating the obvious. As a general subject it is already covered at, for example, Media bias. The one cited statement actually says that there is no bias, which certainly was not the creator's intention if his history is considered. Sitush (talk) 17:05, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - yet another Maheshkumaryadav POV fork--Sodabottle (talk) 08:24, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no content to for an article. Hence not required. If any points are to be raised with proper references it can be in Media in India article as a separate section. VasuVR (talk, contribs) 05:14, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Poorly sourced, no substantive content. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:57, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and Sodabottle. — Abhishek ^{Talk to me} 06:05, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.