This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep (no consensus). Mindspillage (spill yours?) 13:37, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

No content. Cannot be made a sub-stub as there is no information at all related to mechanical restoration. Cannot make a redirect to restoration as mechanical restoration links from there. Jay 14:08, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep — there's nothing at all about refurbishing old furniture or fixing up an old car? Seems like there should be a boat-load, unless I completely misunderstand this. :) — RJH 15:10, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Material is already well covered. Follow the "related topics" links, and you'll see. If we're talking about hanging onto this in the hopes that it will contain information, then we need to debate the naturalness and usfulness of the title. To me, this title is not at all a natural search. Geogre 18:24, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep potential for expansion. JamesBurns 11:05, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete it adds nothing new and in fact the article creates a loop back to itself from the disambig page. The work done is better covered in another article and the disambig page was modified to reflect this. Vegaswikian 06:49, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.